However, it is a review paper. It is not a single emprical research.
Also, the researcher use the "snow-ball" method to collect more papers. Surely it is more efficient then searching on their own, but it might have bias, as most researchers like to quote researchs support their study, those not "in-the-line" with their view might be ignored. Therefore, "snow-ball" method may result in papers having similar view, and those with different view are missed.
Of course, for an experienced researcher, he/she should be objective in choosing papers. Therefore the bias might be minimized. :)
3 comments:
Present a really clear picture of the article.
A good introduction to this research. :)
However, it is a review paper. It is not a single emprical research.
Also, the researcher use the "snow-ball" method to collect more papers. Surely it is more efficient then searching on their own, but it might have bias, as most researchers like to quote researchs support their study, those not "in-the-line" with their view might be ignored.
Therefore, "snow-ball" method may result in papers having similar view, and those with different view are missed.
Of course, for an experienced researcher, he/she should be objective in choosing papers. Therefore the bias might be minimized. :)
forgot to say, I'm from the group of "Infocycle" :D
Post a Comment